Tate Modern
-
Damages: an appropriate remedy?
Natasha Rees considers when a court will grant an injunction or damages in lieu following Tate Modern case
-
The litigation game
Economic, environmental and safety concerns are increasingly placing landlords and tenants at loggerheads
-
Tate Modern dispute with Neo Bankside residents finally comes to an end
Gallery agrees to operate its viewing platform in a way that does not cause a nuisance to residents
-
Where next for the law of nuisance?
What is the wider impact of the decision in Fearn, and where will the law develop in the future?
-
Is the law of nuisance still relevant in the 21st century?
Where does the law of nuisance currently stand following the Supreme Court ruling in Fearn?
-
Award-winning views on the Tate Modern
The winning entries to the PLA’s 2023 Alan Langleben Memorial Blog Competition
-
The considered view on Tate Modern
A look at the fallout from the decision on the Tate Modern viewing platform
-
Q&A: What constitutes a nuisance?
Practical questions arising from the Supreme Court’s decision in the Tate Modern case
-
What constitutes a ‘nuisance’ in Scotland?
The implications of Fearn north of the border
-
A straightforward view on nuisance
Louise Clark looks at how the Tate Modern decision may affect how nuisances are defined in court
-
On the Case: Views on Tate Modern and visual intrusion nuisance
LISTEN: EG discusses the outcome of the Tate Modern nuisance case
-
Back to Basics: Visual intrusion constitutes a nuisance
Inviting members of the public to admire the view from a viewing platform is not a common and ordinary use of land