Back
Legal

On the Case: Who pays for property fraud, post-Dreamvar?

Last week, the Court of Appeal gave its eagerly awaited judgment in a combined appeal involving two much-discussed cases: Dreamvar (UK) Ltd v Mishcon de Reya and P&P Property Ltd v Owen White & Catlin LLP.

Each raised important questions over who should be held liable to victims of conveyancing fraud, as both involved a fraudulent “seller” making off with a would-be purchaser’s funds.

In the latest episode of On the Case, Owen Talfan Davies, partner at Fieldfisher, analyses what he describes as an “eminently sensible judgment, which removes the uncertainty created by the earlier decisions in the first instances cases, and ensures that victims of fraud can now recover their losses – which in these and other cases have been significant.”

Start your free trial today

Your trusted daily source of commercial real estate news and analysis. Register now for unlimited digital access throughout April.

Including:

  • Breaking news, interviews and market updates
  • Expert legal commentary, market trends and case law
  • In-depth reports and expert analysis

Up next…